ext_49024 ([identity profile] laylalawlor.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] layla 2006-01-26 05:15 pm (UTC)

No, it's like that in the U.S. too, you're right. The thing about Quark is that it never really had that much competition -- PageMaker was the closest thing, and was clearly an inferior product, much less powerful with a lot of little things that made it difficult to use for a large-scale operation. (This particular paper used PageMaker, but that's relatively rare.) InDesign is like Quark-plus ... all the things that used to make Quark better than PageMaker, without all of Quark's, er, quirks.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org