See, that's the thing ... I find human development fascinating, and there was a photo feature in, where was it, Scientific American or National Geographic or something a few years ago that had pages and pages of big glossy pictures of living fetuses taken at various stages of development with a little microcamera inside a woman's body -- that was COOL.

This is more like the fetus equivalent of dogs playing poker ... with the addition of freaky religious overtones and the idea that the person who runs the site apparently thinks that they're saving babies by doing it. (Also, the mention that the dolls are based on actual fetuses, not fetuses in general but SPECIFIC ones ... this is particularly bizarre and disturbing in the case of the littlest ones, because -- okay, I've never seen a human miscarriage, but growing up on a farm, I've seen very premature animal fetuses, and EWW. Cute inside the body; not nearly so cute outside the body.)